2.       Natural anatomical evidence present in Human Anatomy in differences in composition and proportion between Man and Woman demonstrates that they are not made in the same image. Also, the conceptual understanding of Gender implicitly maintains that masculinity and femininity are conceptual entities which exist distinct from one another.

3.       The Holy and Perfect Nature of God precludes Woman from being made in God's Image as she currently exists without God violating his Holy and Perfect Nature, and thus corrupting himself in the process and causing catastrophic ramifications to emanate through existence which certainly would exponentially dwarf the current ramifications of corruption, sin, and death present in our world due to the fall of mankind in original sin.

4.       That Genesis 1:27 is not an Argument. It is not an Argument presented by God with a premise and a conclusion in itself or anywhere else contained in the Holy Bible. It cannot be fashioned into an argument as it becomes nonsense as that argument is logically invalid due to the omnipotence of God. Genesis 1:27 is a passage in the Bible where God essentially makes 2 explicit statements about his creation of human beings. 1.) That Man, the Male human being, was created in God's Image and 2.) God made human beings to be of two genders, male and female.

5.     Majority or popular opinion in no way or means based solely on itself legitimately proves or validates that such a viewpoint is valid and true even if a majority of perceived Christianity believes and asserts Woman being made in the Image of God. Such a notion rather exemplifies the worldliness of the current dismal state of organized denominational Christianity rather than affirming a contradiction of reason within the Holy Bible and with th apostolic members of Christianity and 1^st century disciples of Jesus Christ and centuries of established Judaism.

Additional 18 assertions in Continuum Argument

6.    Induction by examination of Scripture contained in the Holy Bible eventually eliminates all extraneous subsets of conceptual possibility of God's image being anything other than a masculine image. Alluded to is the passage of Mathew 11:25, in which Jesus unmistakably addresses God in the first person as “...O Father ... ” and thereby also as an entirely masculine being validating this line of reasoning.

7.    It is established via Genesis 5:3 that the Image of God in original precident was passed on by means of inheritance from Fathers to Sons from fathers to their sons as Seth was begotten of Adam and was thereby made in the image of Adam through whom he inherits the image of God. No Biblical mention of abstraction from fathers to their daughters or from mother's to their daughters.

Copyright (c) 2016