16. In the analogy of Jeremiah 13:11, God ascribes in the highest anatomical masculine terms the masculinity of his being, literately referencing the chief area of the human anatomy that is uniquely male. It is self explanatory. God in the person of the Father without exception never characterizes himself symbolically in a physical manifestation in a way that is feminine whether that symbolism is enacted in a non gendered metaphorical form or in the particular appearance of his masculine image in which God made man. Though God in his prophetic words alludes to certain divine nurturing actions in alliterative form through feminine agencies, the alliteration equates those feminine agencies to the actions of God, but not to the person of God himself. (Mathew 23:37, Luke 13:34, & Deuteronomy 32:11-12) Note the distinction as it is pertinent.

Also, concerning the non-gendered metaphorical forms contained in scripture in which God presents himself such as is the case of the divine fire on the bush before Moses or in the whirlwind before Job, the presentation of the beings form of existence is a metaphorical essence in visual form alluding to God's present functioning nature in the context of a substantive situation rather than the appearance of God's actual unchanging physical image which God has endowed men to posses from the beginning. One reasons this in that God exercises his divine prerogative of supreme authority through his omnipotence to clothe himself with majesty (Job 40:10) in whatsoever way God enacts. In the sum total of all this section wherein the symbolic nature of God is examined, it is seen then that the likeness of God's physical image must be without variance (Malachi 3:6), unequivocally masculine.

17. If there is co-equality and coexistence of the image of God being present in both genders of humanity, why would one surmise that there should be a distinction in God's process of creating Adam and in Eve at all in creation where Adam was formed out of the dust and Eve was formed from Adam? It is maintained that in this distinction, in God's methodology of the creation of Adam and Eve, that it was so enacted because Adam was to be an image bearer of God and Eve was not, and thus Adam came to have God given authority over her, and secondly, the symbolism of this points to the relationship of God to his people where God is the husband and his people are his wedded wife. Lastly, there is a portion of the Bible, Zachariah 5:6, where woman is symbolically seen as having judgment in the earth in wickedness in accordance with the spirit of Anti-Christ. This spirit has been in humanity throughout the ages and one deems a chief mode in which it exists in the world at large today is in the belief system of postmodernism which is seen at large in even in denominational Christianity in the promotion of Women as authority figures, as co-equal co-bearers of the image of God in complete contradiction to the Holy Bible and in full concordance with the spirit of this age, the inner workings of Lucifer (Revelation 20:2) which can be characterized as being Anti-Genesis, Anti-God, and Anti-Christ.

18. Hebrews 7:10 - “For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.”

(Referring to Levi)

The passage of Hebrews 7:10 is encountered as the orator of Hebrews is touching on the the nature of the Order of the priesthood of Melchisedec. It contains the tangential point that precedence is ascribed to the male gender of humanity in man's anatomy in the inheritance of human creation which supports Genesis 5:3 in affirming the endowment of the Image of God upon the male gender of humanity through inheritance.