Back
Section 3:Advanced Christology,
Conceptualized Full Span of the Image of God
“Epluribus Unim” Encapsulated by
Fundamental mode of Linearity
AX=B
Prologue:
Treatise 1 & 2, in their corresponding sections, allow us to grasp true Christian Orthodoxy. We have seen how man from birth, man only and man alone and not the woman, is the Image of God from creation; how Chronologically individual man and woman are renewed unto the Image of God as bearers of that Image in and by the Lord Jesus Christ; and eventually, how man and woman form a unity which is the Image of God as a recursive prelude to the eternal joining of God to the souls of his people in the eventual immutable marriage of God to his people at the close of this creation, in Alpha and Omega.
As much as so far, we have identified 4 unique forms of God's image, one might suppose are there any more Images of God, and if so how many? And how does one cognizant and studious of theology identify and number the Images of God. My personal count so far is that there are perhaps 9 forms of the Image of God known to my person (though some I do not commit to memory) in existence of the world reality.
But wouldn't it be better to rather understand the bounds, the model and method that divinity uses to procure the Image of God in Living Creation which continues unto this day rather than just to parse the bible looking for unconventional “forms”? The combined knowledge of the Greeks, deductive reasoning, and Plato's theory of the Ideas or forms, all provide an ample identifier, a sort of litmus test for recursion, but that alone is not definitive.
Still, the answer is, yes, that there is such a way. There is a more excellent way to grasp divinity in God's Image then what has so far been demonstrated. It is much more simple then one might imagine, a concise and elegant solution to centuries old dilemma. In that way of providence, God has revealed the solution in the course of human advancement understanding and knowledge.
For the vast majority of us, it seems we either one.) outright deny the truth or two.) we have fail to realize the full measure and subsequent implications of that knowledge, or else we would have grasped the implications that 2 and 3 millennia of increased learning has imbued in remaining faithful to an orthodox judea/christian theology. It is an understanding which I have come to realize that our forefathers held if not by complete and utterly full understanding of the Image Dei, then they nevertheless attained unto orthodoxy by God's Spirit, for they rightly esteemed it of such importance to see to it to embed acquiescence and acknowledgment the Image in multiple foundations of our Christian Nation. They formed a nation in covenant with the Living God, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God
of Jacob. Hence, the Image of God construction is interwoven in our Nation's Deceleration of Independence, Great Seal, and later into our Currency. .
During and just prior to A.D. 1776
In the Deceleration of Independence in that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal [“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;...” (Genesis 1:21)],
that they endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, ...” & “ … appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world [“The earth is the LORD’S, and the fullness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein.” (Psalm24:1) & “...
for God is judge himself. Selah” (Psalm 50:6)] for the rectitude of our intentions, ...”., under the Great Seal and upon our currencies embedded as the “de facto motto of the U.S.A,
E pluribus unum, Latin for “Out of many, One”. Concept solution to the Image lies herein and it is attested by scripture and by scripture's providence.
Before 1400 B.C.
“That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore ...” (Genesis 22:18)
“And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.” (Genesis 22:19)
“... and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son. And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-jireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen.” (Genesis 22:13-14)
590-570's B.C.
“... Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.” (Ezekiel 37:19)
585 B.C.
“Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that they shall no more say, The LORD liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt; But, The LORD liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land.” (Jeremiah 23:7-8)
700 B.C.
“In that day, saith the LORD, will I assemble her that halteth, and I will gather her that is driven out, and her that I have afflicted; And I will make her that halted a remnant, and her that was cast far off a strong nation: and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion from henceforth, even for ever.” (Micah 4:6-7)
740-700 B.C.
“Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand. He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities. Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.”
“Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear; break forth into singing, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail with child: for more are the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife, saith the LORD.” (Isaiah 53:10-54:1)
Referencing 33 A.D. written 90's A.D.
“When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.” (John 19:30)
E pluribus unum, “Out of many, One”.
--------------------------------------------------
If America the Beautiful, so what mode in divinity draws many from one, and assemblies One, from many? As this present hour and for the last 60 years, the trend building to now where currently well over 90% percent of Protestant Christianity even to over 99%, whose forefathers formed this Nations founding by drawing contract with God, they affirm that E pluribus unum comes from an inferior, remedially infantile 1 + 1 = 2. That a right in one's own eyes, Humanism, Mammon-ism, Feminism, Satanism , 1 + 1 = 2 arithmetic, filling the span of heaven, that all human beings were created coequal in
God's Image! They allege egregious blasphemy. “Man and Woman created he him and he her. Equals created he them” is Genesis 1:27, they affirm GOD rather said!
Behold the resemblance.
“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?”. (Genesis 3:1)
What is their expectation? Anti-Christ prosperity in the legalism of the power of the prince of the Air “... Go, and come again, and to morrow I will give; when thou hast it by thee. ...” (Proverbs 3:28) and it shall be well with us. The Band Aerosmith has concurred for the span of 3 or 4 decades now. Their 1993 song Living on the Edge declares it. “Their
is something right with the world today and everbody knows its wrong” is their songs profession. In America we live and see God's messianic prophecy fulfilled in many such ways. And God has declared that he would speak in this way and at such an hour, in a Nation under such a covenant relationship to him hundreds of years before the U.S. existed. (Joel 2:21-3:21 586 B.C.) And it shall come to pass afterward, [that] I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: (Joel 2:28)
As it is with Church of Sardis and the children of men,the time came and passed for them to lose their life which they must to enter in (Christ's decleration John12:25-26). They are offended (reference Mark 8::35) and “Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue for ever, ...” (Psalm 49:11). “... Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.”(Mathew19:23) but how much more difficult is it for a
“rich nation” that has built its wealth with unjust balances than it is for just a “rich man”, for God himself requires a just weight and a just balance. (reference Deuteronomy 25:15-15)
and God has his way in the whirlwind as he pleads with all flesh for one can give you 30+ trillion reasons why in usury alone, about a third of which exceeds GDP.
Why, ultimately, because“... MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. ...” (Revelation 17:6), her children, Caiaphas and her daughters stand in the midst of her house just under a cross, directing worship, preaching, and teaching. So it is seen and heard within at least a 60 year old donkey, an insistence upon a false Genesis Image, crying out with obstinacy,
“He-haw, He-haw, He-haw” as terrible Babylon does try make subtle substitute an improvisational donkey for the lamb slain before the foundations of the world. “... for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.” (Revelation 18:7)
saith the Holy Bible concerning her among other decrees. So it is also the humanist of this world would follow suit in norms. He stands to the side ,and is and will be offended that his expectation is spoiled, that his reality will no longer yield her yin and yang wherein he has
built all his wisdom. God has “... set the world in their hearts ...”. (Ecclesiastes 3:11)
This is 2 & half thousand years of world history presented as backdrop in the rise and fall of Nations, in which a unique and definitive knowledge presentation of the full concept of God's Image is being made known to any and all visiting this ministry. It proceeds as follows.
CONCEPTUAL INTRODUCTION AX=B:
As ultimate concept of God's Image to HIS IMAGE, to introduce AX=B, linearity, the line, let us first forget what is known in man's millennia of learning. Briefly let us suppose things as naturally as possible as adherents to “pure” religion as simple “children of scripture”.
It is healthy for us to suppose, if we are Christians so let us suppose, what does one suppose a primary reason for God creating the universe is and was?
God has taught us, he has revealed himself to us in the Holy Bible and in History in addition to the Logos of the Greeks. Just outside the Throne Space of heaven before the Lamb slain from the foundations of the world, both the twenty four elders and the Cherub fell down at Christ's feet. They declared “Though art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power, for thy pleasure they are and were created.” (Revelation 4:11) (*Side Note* That would be say about a 1,900 year follow up answer to say an 1800 B.C. supposition in the offering of Issac
upon the altar wherein substitution was made by God, “And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-jireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the LORD it shall be seen.”. (Genesis 22:14)
Judea-Christian christology proclaims a primary purpose for God's creation which is, for God's pleasure they are and were created to be joined unto him as like unto a marriage, a holy single marriage of unequals. AX=B. God and virgin Jerusalem. Not 1 + 1 = 2 as if 2 stars only could much span the firmament of heaven.
For Hebrew old testament concordance this notion in spanning AX=B, there is Psalm 51. “Do good in thy good pleasure unto Zion: build thou the walls of Jerusalem.”(Psalm 51:18) as Jerusalem in the eternal sense is “that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, ...” (Revelation 21:10) “... coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” (Revelation 21:2) by “For the LORD taketh pleasure in his people: ...” (Psalm 149:4) and “As
the mountains are round about Jerusalem, so the LORD is round about his people from henceforth even for ever.”. (Psalm 125:2) Syllogism holds the statement true.
Again the answer, universe and mankind existence created by God for his pleasure, and further more, that pleasure is to create a harmony of eternal living children for he is an eternal living God who exists in Holiness. God venerates others so that the universe is not to be populated by a mere Monad or even a few, God and a few Angels for God said unto Abraham, “… Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.”. (Genesis 15:5)
For further concurrence, we should say deductively, it reasons for God not to make a universe a prison for one Supreme Being. Man has reasoned the same for himself if he were “master of his own ship”, that he would wish to do likewise in companionship as God has. Concurrence is found in academic Athenian dialectal in which Aristotle deducts, “For without friends no one would choose to live, though he had all other goods;”
(Nicomachean Ethics, Bk. 8, 1055a 6.) and God's chosen Apostle the gentile world concurs for he says, “... and have not charity, I am nothing.” (1 Corinthians 13:1-2)
seeing that the “charity” Paul is referencing is "way of 'άγάπη' " in the Greek, “a way of Agape love”. This is ,of course, implies also an E Pluribus Unim, a way of love in unity and harmony of like others.
“The LORD thy God, ... which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;” (Deuteronomy 7:9) The wedding garment of Christ is a choice, not an automation response which Lord God Omnipotent (Revelation 19:7) could enact upon the sum of humankind if that were what LORD God Omnipotent chiefly desired, automation upon automatons of dust. Then life would really be a ride at the
like of a theurgy themed amusement park. It could be a small world of coequals after all, a 1 + 1 smallest substantive of integers addition puppet show. But how quickly does a child tire of playing with lifeless toys in a sand box? How much swifter the creator of Heaven and Earth, for he saith as One upon the throne, “And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.” (Revelation 22:17) and the Son has spoken"For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him."(Luke 20:38). It would appear he would not force anyone to spend eternity with him always as an indeterminate automated puppet never
having been capable of making choice.
So we have layed a grasp upon a divine modus operandi, to venerate a pleasing and holy “E pluribus unum”. Let us suppose as to method, the methodology God has chosen to accomplish this. We would suspect the most excellent of methods in maximum efficiency for what is maintained is a God of excellence.
From an awesome Creator, we can expect an excellent supremely efficient and ever applicable method, which is AX=B, not a coequal 1 + 1 = 2.
AX=B:
Well, what is AX=B, and why it is so excellent?
AX=B is the equation of fundamental linearity. It is the simplest and purest equation formula in all mathematics. We can rule out the point, which is simpler than the line or plane, because it has no structure as it is asymptotic in nature. The point is conceptually dimensionless. At the time of Isaiah, 700 B.C, man did not so comprehensibly understand the mathematical ramifications of the line nor Algebra itself. One understands the hermeneutic vacillation and misgivings of
Augustine (354 -430 A.D.) concerning woman as Image seeing that Greek Mathematician Diophantus, the Western father of Algebra & author of “Arithmatica”, had only relatively recent arrival on the scene of history. It appears Man did not look much inward to the four subspaces of AX=B and dual solution nature of the equations “complete solution” in linearity until say the 17th century with Lebinitz looking at solving systems of simultaneous linear equations. Then one imagines that learned men would have begun to grasp full measure of “E pluribus Unim” true biblical grasp of God's Image. The highest ideals of the sensible world (fundamental principals of “pure mathematics”, etc.) reverberating the perfection of the intelligible world. In any event, “E pluribus Unim” is the motto of our nations Great Seal and embedded upon our coin so that we might remember that “rendering unto God
the things that our due Him is not “adaiphorous” (Luke 20:25), not being neither here nor there, and that we are not as Christians to render things due to “God” as do unto “Man that “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God” and that the notion “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator ...” from our Declaration of Independence in the 18th Century, they do point to the providence of revelation of God in the Christian unfolding of human history and founding of Nations, and not an inferior mere sort of postmodern Jeffersonian humanism gratis of self determinism, an enactment of man solely (Jeremiah 18:9) in false christology and sophistry.
AX=B contains the correct subspaces of all “actualized reality” to mutually satisfy both all Judea-christian scriptural sufficiency and Plato “Ideas” or “Forms”. AX=B even illuminates a “mystery of God” concerning Soul Space and the “Throne Space of Heaven” (AYT=0) and it's subsequent infinite reverberation. Furthermore, the complete solution to AX=B contains perfect organization in category the Genesis Image of God. The first and primary Image belongs only to “the man” as the homogeneous solution (AX=0) and the other Genesis Image, a Unity along with the New Covenant Images of Christ and other recursive forms the image of God are then aptly contained in the “particular solution to AX=B. Both together superimposed form the complete solution, and thus the entire span of Heaven in Soul Reality.
So in christology, is AX=B hermeneutically legitimate? Yes.
The Apostle Paul provides the interlude. He taught, “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; ...” (Romans 1:20) A principal thing which can be deduced from this single Pauline statement is that Plato's Forms and the extension of that Hellenistic philosophical knowledge, that they are legitimate means of understanding divinity. With this Biblical legitimacy affirmed by God's chosen vessel unto the Gentile world, we will use Platonism discernment of God's not just to determine divine immutability and transcendence, not just the nature of the Godhead, but we may and will use philosophical excellence of the Greeks to aptly
discern the nature the Image Dei, the full understanding of God's Image. Why centuries tried “pure” philosophy harmonized with Biblical Orthodoxy., because we must for as of this day in the 21st century, the vast majority of Mankind puts itself forward in a colossal stubbornness so that there seems no other way which the children men will even consider Christian orthodoxy other then to definitively settle the issue with an “overwhelming” faculty.
The Greeks knew the One as transcendent and immutable as did the Hebrews by doctrine and one reasons the Apostle Paul well knew this from both knowledge trajectories as it is thought that he likely possessed a dual Hebrew and Hellenistic education. By the time of Paul, Aristotle's works is a few centuries old in which Aristotle's works state the following:
The first mover, then, exists of necessity; and it is in this sense a first principle. For because it is contrary to the natural impulse, that without which the good is impossible, and that which cannot be otherwise but can exist only in a single way. - On such a principle, then, depends the heavens and world of nature.” (Metaphysics p.880 lines 10-14, The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon) Also, according to Aristotle, “The first principle or primary being is not
movable wither in itself or accidentally, but produces the primary eternal and single movement. But since that which is moved must be moved by something, and the first mover must be in itself unmovable, and eternal movement by a single thing, ...” (Metaphysics p.881 lines 24-31, The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by Richard McKeon)
And this is the Hebrew God of the Bible being detailed without variance because God himself concurs, “For I [am] the LORD, I change not; ...”. (Malachi 3:6)
We step beyond inherence alone to understanding the highest form of creation stems also from “a single thing,”. A single source. By advanced Platonism we have, “that the intelligible world itself is a hierarchy”(Introduction p.XX par 4, Neoplatoninc Philosophy Introductory Readings, John Dillion and Lloyd P. Gerson), “What this means above all is that
[1.)] there must be an absolutely first principle of all, and [2.)] it must be absolutely simple.” So we know that God as creator is 1.) unchanging. 2). A single entity as the first principle of all existence, and 3.) in this form God must be absolutely simple.
Now, Aristotle commenting on Plato's Ideas says “for the Forms are the causes of the essence of all other things, and the One is the cause of the essence of the Forms:”. ( The Basic Works of Aristotle, Metaphysics BK I: CH.6 10 ). From this we know something else, that God is the “Prime Mover” or the agent of cause who has no other prior cause. But now we might have a conundrum?
In Genesis 1:26 it is written, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: ...”. At this point in creation, God is referring to himself as a plurality of beings, The Angels and Himself. If God made the universe along with another entity, then all of Greek Philosophy and Plato's Forms are in contradiction with the Holy Bible as Aristotle has deduced that God must create in creation as a single entity, “... and eternal movement by a single thing.” Now this Bible God can only be a single entity if he and the Angels form an infinite Modal Recursive Unity in One. Therefore, we have both deduced and observed a Unity in Genesis that
the God of the Holy Bible created the universe in a single Mode of Recursive Unity composed of Himself and Angels. A Oneness out of many, or “E pluribus unum”.
So one wonders how do we think of God outside of all Unity in a simplest or more simple form? The answer is that such is not even possible since that would delineate change within divinity itself and since ontological modalism exists in Unity as infinitely reflexive, so it is also not possible to so conceive correctly. In other words Unity is always participating in effect “relation” upon Divinity. Apparently there is no ontological monad that is ultimately disjuct from all unity though the 2nd person of the Godhead can differentiate forms for temporal enactment (Revelation 5:6-7). The One as Dyad through the Son can extend himself as the Angel of the LORD (Psalm 18:9-10 or upon angels as the Holy Spirit (Revelation 22:7-9), God in Third Person (Genesis 28:10-13, John 14:25-26, John 15:26-27, 16:7, Psalm 110:1, Luke 20:42-44, Revelation 3:21). As form Father and Son together are always in dyad unity within the
Throne Space (Psalm 23:6), so it is that a dyad must be the simplest modal form. The Father is fully God but is always with the Son. The Son is fully God, but is either in unity with the Father as monad One within the throne space or is fully God as the Son, 2nd entity of the Dyad in or outside of the Throne Space. Whether the Father as One or Son of himself, God always extendable by Dyad upon the throne which is a unity Monad. (Psalm 16:10 & 110:1) We can think of the Living God in the same manner as in Unity as an immutable infinite convergence into Holiness so by all evidence in Unity that is how it appears God exists in any mode, Father, Son, or Holy Spirit. When one prays to the Father they prey also to Father and Son for they are One.
Isn't the Lamb standing before the throne as it had been slain a separation distinction of the Godhead, one might ask? (Revelation 5:6-7) My understanding is No, that it is not a separation in divinity. Even in that the Father upon the throne I believe is still in dyad, and the Lamb, Jesus Christ, is extension of the Son of the Dyad in the mode of symbolic form construction of Christ crucified in the enactments of heaven in heaven's “form” or “idea” dominion over time and space. Pre-crucifixion, the Angel of the LORD appearing unto Mosses from the midst of an in-consumable burning bush (Exodus 3:2) is of the same sort of unity extension of the Son in the “Forms” as this particular example being used from the Book of Revelation.
Concieve of it this way. The simplest shape in existence is a point. As “pure” concept, in ontological form, a point is an infinitesimally asymptotic, having no extension or dimension. It occupies a position but is dimensionless, conceptually transcendent from the spatial universe. A point therefore can manifest upon a line an infinite number of specific positions. Here, again, Christ of the Bible agrees. The Bible conveys that “God is a Spirit: ...” (John 4:24), and "And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth." (Revelation 19:6), and also Platonism concurs as that
philosophy believes God achieves omnipotence say for example in the Divine holding the bounds of the universe infinite not by being infinite oneself but by transcending the senesible world altogether. (deducted from R.T. Wallis, Neoplatonism Second Edition, p. 56 par 2 & note 3 from Enneads) To converge upon the throne space is like convergence in to an infinitesimal asymptote. It is approachable but unreachable save by Christ who is the mode himself who bridges that gap. (Ezekiel 34:24, 37:24)
So a “pure” point” transcends spatial reality. A line does not. And these 2 are the 2 simplest structures in concept existence. The point more simple than the line. Therefore, they are also the 2 most Ontological structures in spatial reality because it has been deduced that God “must be absolutely simple.” by Advanced Platonism. Aristotle says in refuting Parmenides notion that God is limited concerning a One in unity. “For though the limit is indivisible, the limited is not.”.( (Physics p.220 lines 15-20 note 3, The Basic Works of Aristotle,
edited by Richard McKeon) referring to a point which terminates a line as being indivisible while the line itself is divisible. And again this agrees with Advanced Platonism. “The Intelligible world's boundlessness must, of course, in any case consist not in infinite spatial extension (*like in an infinite line*) but in complete non-spatiality.” (R.T. Wallis, Neoplatonism Second Edition, p. 56 par 2 & note 3 from Enneads)
And, disregarding an utter infinity example of linearity, AX=B contains the point and a line. (One can even argue that even the dual infinite line contains an infinite number of points, conceptual abridgment infinity into the infinitesimal as a sort “circle in the sand”, “circle” truncated in size until a mere “point, all the while being a structure composed of limitless infinitesimal number of points into infinity, without beginning or without end, but it seems to veer towards over-complicating the matter more than what is necessary in the exploration of “geometry” potency unless you are per say Jesus Christ as man contemplating eternity as a fundamental agent in the eternal dyad? (Perhaps John 8:6?))
Then a “point” unified as the starting point of a line is our model concept, but in any case, with the highest form of God represented by the point (that would be convergence upon the “monad”), and the line which the indivisible point is infinitely part of together, that would form a “concept” trinity, 3 subspace married with the 4rth subspace. In fact, the four subspaces of AX=B delineate, in the intelligible world, a monad in Unity with a Triad! This is synchronous with the Holy Bible's Father's dominion over a unity of Spirit (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost whilst retaining ultimate position as the 'Ancient of Days”) with the Neo-platonic Oracles, a work which claims concerning a “Supreme Deity”. “But most important of all were the Oracles description of him as a trinity and unity, and their claim, in such declarations as that 'in every world shines a triad ruled by a monad'
(Kr. p. 18) ( (Introduction p.106 par 1, Neoplatoninc Philosophy Introductory Readings, John Dillion and Lloyd P. Gerson)
And what Form does that take. It takes the form of AX = B, the fundamental equation of all linearity. It contains the Point (twofold Alpha and Omega) and the Line. Remember what Aristotle said. “The first principle or primary being is not movable wither in itself or accidentally” The point does not change, and being transcendent spatially, it cannot be divided. The line does not change (constant slope, derivative constant fixed quantity or zero), but is divisible and a point delineates a starting (or ending) position of the line. “... I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than
I.” (John 14:28) said Jesus Christ. The Apostle Paul affirmed “And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.” (1 Corinthians 15:28) Only the Linearity of AX=B holds the span of solution “all in all” in permanence and contains the metaphysical “idea” subspaces to structurally make sense, not the boorish antiquated humanism arithmetic of coequal 1 + 1 = 2.
When all living souls are joined at the eternal wedding of the universe, “all in all”, a unity, then the form of that is the same as in the beginning, even prior to when God said “Let there be light.” in Genesis. Out of that is a “One” in divinity. God says “I am Alpha and Omega.” (Revelation) in exactly the same way in the beginning of the universe as at the end of the universe as a point starts and ends any physical line. Aristotle declared in deduction that God “...
can exist only in a single way”. And this is accomplished without Hinduism Cosmic Egg Theory where unto God is said to be everything which He is not everything, but has dominion and reigns over everything and returns unto himself in inherent perfection.
And that is definitive! That is an elegant AX=B linearity, not a brutish coequal 1 + 1 = 2 which is incompatible in form. Furthermore, 2 and 1 have differing mathematical properties. For this small integer grouping, each element at the end of a reflexive addition operation, there is a marked difference. For the the integer 2 as unlike in God the nature of the product is changed whose square was once divisible by only itself is now divisible by 1, 2, and 4. Also, if you square or cube 2 you get something other than itself if self which is by particular example 1 and 2. It is not so for the integer 1 and only the integer 1 in an integer set that contains only the integer 1 beyond the empty set. Also, Ocam's razor tells us that in necessity of design, beginning from a starting point of 1, as it being the ontological more simple is superior to a dual starting point of 2.
Contrary to woman made in the image of God parallel mathematically as a finite 1 + 1 = 2 addition, the Line AX = B spans infinity without variance (1 varies from 2 and both are finite integers). AX=B never changes its construction form even though it fills the stars of heaven and the promise of Abraham. AX=B composes the Resurrection of the Living and was to populate the world in perfection by Genesis edict of God, “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth ...”. (Genesis 1:28)
The way of the children of Men who in their pride lost their fear of God is a coequal 1 + 1 = 2, Image Dei. Woman as Image of God coequal and equivalent with man as Image of God. Infantile, vain, false and utterly untrue. The Living God's Image Dei, AX=B, an elegant solution to all soul divinity in all of reality which accommodates perfectly both an orthodox Genesis Images and the ramifications of the New Covenant Images of Jesus Christ! *IMPORTANT*
God has spoken. “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.”. (Isaiah 55:8-9) And so the like of AX=B over anti-Christ coequal 1 +1 = 2 which I have observed that 90% to over 99% of visible Protestant entities adheres to presently. To ordain oneself in postmodern “humanism religion”, a right in ones own
eyes humanism, “free from sexism bigotry”, at the cost of adorning anti-Christ as nakedness before the King of the Universe wherefore it is written “Ye shall shalt not tempt the LORD your God.” All it costs is everything! To deny the Image is to deny E Pluribus Unim, is tantamount to denying Christ and ultimately his atonement, in which he once and for all time reconciled mankind reconcilable to God's supreme plan for eternal existence which is God's good pleasure. How lofty a mass Postmodern Church must think itself, to knowingly and willfully defy the God of the universe in disruption of GOD's eternal existence mode? So it has come to the point of precipice , that the christian world will do either
REPENTANCE joined with CONTRITION or PUNISHMENT UNTO ANNIHILATION, Protestant Churches Choice, as God continues to plead with all flesh (reference Deuteronomy 32:36, Isaiah 66:16, Joel 3:2).
“But I said, How shall I put thee among the children, and give thee a pleasant land, a goodly heritage of the hosts of nations? and I said, Thou shalt call me, My father; and shalt not turn away from me.”. (Jeremiah 3:19)
In denial of the Image; in denial of E Pluribus Unim; in denial of all orthodoxy and scripture; in denial of Christ; Magua was right! Understand the English very well, that he (the English) lays down his tomahawk to feed his woman's laziness and makes himself slave to her.(1992 Movie “Last of the Mohicians”) She consumes God's “... people as they eat bread,” (reference Psalm
14:4). One doesn't much need to ask why Magua bares his rage on the Theater Screen (Psalm 2:1). Such are the Ideas, adiaphorous at one time, foretelling in an another hour of judgment. (Psalm 37:10&35-36) Again, 20Th & 21st Century postmodern Protestantism is so contrary to Christianity that
she justifies Ayatollah Khomeini rather than it is that she obeys Jesus Christ, and so the destroyer should well not depart from America as if inside the Protestant Church, it were a little thing to, for over half a century, continually offend in Divine Image “the Prince of Peace”. It is He of whom it is written, “Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish [from] the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little.” (Psalm 2:11-12) and “Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.”. (Psalm 2:9) And God has set aside such an hour to judge the world.